PLUS MEMBERSHIP
Get unlimited access to hundreds of tutorials, expert advice from NYVS Instructors, and more... Sign up now!

Search on blog
 

RSS

Email Subscription

 

Delivered by FeedBurner


Category

Recent Posts

Archive

Lucian Freud, The Queen of England and Video

Posted on July 24th, 2011 Written on michael's blog


Do you like this?

We are not amused...

Last week saw the passing of Lucian Freud, often described as one of Britain's greatest painters.

Freud, the grandson of Sigmun Freud, as famous for being unrelenting to showing absolute realism in his paintings.

Fat people were fat, but not in the "Rubensesque" way, but rather in the real way - fat.

Old was old, wrinkled was wrinkled.

One of Freud's most controversial paintings was that done of the Queen, shown above, in 2001.

The Daily Telegraph reviewed the paining, to somewhat mixed reviews:

"The newspaper concedes that the Queen "is no longer the heart-breakingly beautiful young woman she was", but maintains she is still "easy on the eye".

 

Yet the Telegraph added Freud has captured the Queen's strong sense of duty and Hanoverian roots, and concludes that the work is "thought provoking" and "every bit as good" as previous efforts.

The chief art critic of The Times, Richard Cork, described the image as "painful, brave, honest, stoical and, above all, clear sighted".

The Sun called the portrait "a travesty"

Robert Simon, editor of the British Art Journal, told the newspaper: "It makes her look like one of the royal corgis who has suffered a stroke."

The Independent, however, says Freud's portrait is being hailed as the most honest representation of the monarch to date.

Under the headline "You're no oil painting, Ma'am", the Mirror says Freud could have saved the Queen the trouble of sitting for him by copying her Spitting Image puppet.

But the paper added that the picture is "unmistakably his own", and says the Queen "should have known what to expect".

Meanwhile, Adrian Searle, the Guardian's art critic, hailed Freud's picture as the best royal portrait for 150 years, and said: "Portraiture is meant to get beneath the skin.

"Freud has got beneath the powder, and that itself is no mean feat.

"Both sitter and painter have seen too much, are easily, stoically bored. They know the shape they're in.

"This is a painting of experience".

Freud was no less 'honest' or powerful when he did his own self-portrait.

Now, (at last) we come to video and television.

What made Freud's painting so powerful was that they were brutally honest.

Had Freud made everyone look like they were wrinkle-free, the paintings might look like out-takes from Vogue, but they would stay with us for less than a minute and make no impression whatsoever.

All of which brings us to television and the people we see on TV, particularly (but not limited to), the people we see on the news.

They are all of a kind- young, smooth skinned, smiling with perfect teeth.

They lack character.

They lack flaws.

They lack what Freud found so compelling in himself, the Queen, or just average people. He captured and honored their flaws. It was that which gave them their humanity, and what made his paintings so profound.

We could use a Freud of video.

 

 


 


Category : People  
4 comment(s)

djwetterstrand
10:37 am Tuesday
Jul 26, 2011
Yes, his portrait of Hemingway is one of my all time favorites! But it seems to me that celebrities and famous people are used to being the center of attention and "looked at" and kind of know how to handle it, but regular people don't, so they are self-conscious. I'm just at the beginning of this learning curve, but the few people I have talked into being filmed (and I had to do some fast talking) were not reluctant because I didn't know what I was doing, they were just plain shy. Know what I mean? Maybe it has to do with being in Canada :)

michael
10:25 am Tuesday
Jul 26, 2011
here's a link for Karsh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yousuf_Karsh

michael
10:25 am Tuesday
Jul 26, 2011
take a look at the work of Yousuf Karsh, great Canadian portrait photographer from the 50s.

djwetterstrand
10:19 am Tuesday
Jul 26, 2011
In a media-generated culture of "image is everything", this kind of honesty is refreshing and compelling. It seems the difficulty would be in finding people who are willing to present themselves that honestly. Two thoughts about that. Annie Leibovitz says, in answer to the question "How do you set people at ease?": Most of the great portrait photographers didn't have a camera in front of their faces, so they could engage the person and get something interesting on camera. Good tip for videographers? Also, people with real passion and vision (and a strong story/message they want to share) care much less about "image." Those are the people to find.