He's also one of the most popular bloggers/tweeters around, with a massive following
Today, on Facebook, he posted a comment:
"Not Every Steve Jobs Idea Was Brilliant"
He then posted this video:
I am not sure whether Roger Ebert understands that this was published in The Onion, and that it is a satire.
Roger, if you are reading this, This Was A Satire. This Was Not Real.
In any event, what was more interesting to me was the commentary that followed the posting on Facebook.
Of the 83 comments (so far) more than half of them believed that the satire was a real news piece and that Jobs had in fact invented the keyboardless device.
And on and on....
Now, here is what I find interesting:
In the world of print, we are pretty good at being able to differentiate between 'real' and 'fake'.
When you walk into a supermarket and see a tabloid with a headline that screams:
You don't actually believe it.
OK, maybe Roger Ebert believes it, but most reasonable people don't.
That's because we have lived in a world of print for more than 500 years and we have developed a certain inherent filtering systemt that says 'most print is BS'. We take it all with a grain of salt, and move on to the produce department.
But with video we are different.
We have only lived in a world of video for about 50 years, and for 99% of that time, the content has been produced for us by people who 'know the truth'.
Video is still 'special', and as such, it carries a more powerful undercurrent to it.
Thus, we are more likely to believe what we see, and accept anything we see in video as inherently more 'truthful', even if it is clearly a satire.
Surely, over time, this will change. But it will take time.
In the meantime, as a culture, we still pay enormous homage to any video image and give it a much wider berth for believability.
Which could go a long way to explaining the impact of 'political advertising' and how some people keep getting snookered all the time.
Lisa was a great innovation at the time but not Job's child, he was working on Mac with his team at the time and almost against Lisa, to show his ideas were better, they were, even if using some of Lisa's best features. Who said Every Idea of a genius has to be good or he has to be a nice fellow? In my opinion, too many people use these days his name, just to get read. Job had intuition and drive and wonderful presenter skills for sure. And so many of us believing in the dream "for the rest of us" and also "we will change the world" I think we should not underestimate the devotion we followed Apple, and of course he was not the only one in it we adored. Wozniak created Apple machine and openness of its basic and hardware, and Atkinson the first on screen MacPaint and even the system behind Liza and Mac and the Hypercard and Hypertalk, programming for rest of us, and so on. Why should Visionaries or geniuses be perfect? Driven people are driven...
markozino123
5:33 pm Thursday
Oct 13, 2011
julie70
12:53 am Thursday
Oct 13, 2011